LB: the whole point is NOT that people literally want to be unaware of what's going on in the world / politics.
but when you are feeling depressed, overwhelmed, and out of control because you're so afraid and sad about the world, it's nice to have a place you can go to chill out and take your mind off it, that doesn't throw all those things in your face every 5 seconds. Hence the content warning insistence.
IT'S EASY FOR YOU (one click), and can be invaluable to somebody else's mental health
@tcql
So I created a Mastodon instance using a party affiliated domain name (albeit as critique, but still). I was hoping political discourse would be a part of my little community. I even called it out in the Code of Conduct.
I'm not abjectly opposed to it, I'm just not sure I 100% agree with it either.
By your guideline every comment on my community would be wrapped in a Content Warning--timelines and conversations would not be usable.
That wouldn't really work very well.
@tcql I understand the desire to shield others from topics that can be uncomfortable, stressful, or overwhelming. But for a community like the one I was hoping to grow, this seems like an untenable obstacle.
Maybe a less heavy-handed solution would be to allow topical instances to flag themselves as such (think NSFW, political, or victim support communtiites). Other instances could then choose whether to CW a specific class of content automatically when it gets pulled into the federated timeline.
@tcql @r4v5 I wonder if @CitySquirrel would like to weigh in on this topic.
@Motoma @tcql this is a thought I've had about how to make a service that would pull in Birdsite Posts for people (as a one-way bridge): this feature would allow folks to still see things but not overrun the federated TL with posts that differ from the general mastodon atmosphere